<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://frankziglar.sys-con.com"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Latest News from Frank Ziglar</title>
 <link>http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/</link>
 <description>Latest News from Frank Ziglar</description>
 <language>en</language>
 <copyright>Copyright 2009 Ulitzer.com</copyright>
 <generator>Ulitzer.com</generator>
 <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:42:16 EST</lastBuildDate>
 <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
 <ttl>360</ttl>
<item>
 <title>Comparing Tomcat Performance Across Platforms</title>
 <link>http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/node/232070</link>
 <description>We measured performance information to see the differences between Windows and Linux platforms. The test done against the Windows server gave users marginally shorter wait-times by electing to turn some traffic away. The Linux server, however, scaled to serving a greater number of users with reasonable responsiveness before its maximum capacity was reached.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/node/232070&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/node/232070</guid>
 <comments>http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/node/232070#feedback</comments>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comparing Tomcat Performance Across Platforms</title>
 <link>http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/node/219979</link>
 <description>We measured performance information to see the differences between Windows and Linux platforms. The test done against the Windows server gave users marginally shorter wait-times by electing to turn some traffic away. The Linux server, however, scaled to serving a greater number of users with reasonable responsiveness before its maximum capacity was reached.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/node/219979&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 14:15:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/node/219979</guid>
 <comments>http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/node/219979#feedback</comments>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comparing Apache Tomcat Performance Across Platforms</title>
 <link>http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/node/209239</link>
 <description>We have measured performance information to distinguish the differences between the Windows and Linux platforms. Given comparable hardware we found the performance differences almost trivial.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/node/209239&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:30:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/node/209239</guid>
 <comments>http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/node/209239#feedback</comments>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comparing Apache Tomcat Performance Across Platforms</title>
 <link>http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/node/204716</link>
 <description>We have measured performance information to distinguish the differences between the Windows and Linux platforms. Given comparable hardware we found the performance differences almost trivial. When the server was pressed to capacity, our Windows installation was forced to turn away some traffic with minimal alteration in service performance, while our Linux installation elected to service nearly all the connections at the cost of introducing latency.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/node/204716&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 10:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/node/204716</guid>
 <comments>http://frankziglar.sys-con.com/node/204716#feedback</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
